blank My CNCSeries
Username:
Password:
blank
(Register)
Content Overview Files Database Tiberium Wars Section Red Alert 3 Section Zero Hour Section Generals Section Yuris Revenge Section Red Alert 2 Section Renegade Section About CNCSeries
» FAQ · History
» Staff · Contact Us

Header
blank
» Forum » Red Alert 3 Discussion » ideas for ra3


Previous Thread In Forum Previous Thread ¦ Next Thread Next thread in forum
Page 2 of 3«--123--»
Myth_ManiacIcon...04:35 09.06.05 

 Reps: 17

#342, 7 Posts


blank
What like capturing techs and stuff? Is engineers still neede by the way?
 
AvianKnightIcon...03:30 13.06.05 

 Reps: 44

#73, 33 Posts


blank
One idea they should borrow from Generals is the default infantry's capturing ability. Leave capturing to the soldiers. I don't have anything to say about the engineer's rapairing feature, though.
 
TriariiIcon...15:11 13.06.05 

 Reps: 111

#98, 95 Posts


15:11 13.06.05 - Edited


Originally posted by Myth_Maniac...
What like capturing techs and stuff? Is engineers still neede by the way?



I dont think they are needed, keeping the dozers from generals or something similar is, in my opinion, a better option than engineers. And i also agree with keeping the infantry capturing ability.
 
tzzIcon...17:27 29.06.05 

 Reps: 33

#157, 18 Posts


17:31 29.06.05 - Edited

Yap.engineers are too costy.speaking of infantry, i think not just GI conscript can garrison.All infantry should be able to garrison accept certain ones like dogs or crazy ivan
 
KOGdemIcon...06:47 04.09.05 

 Reps: 33

#428, 22 Posts


blank

Originally posted by Radiation...
Or a transport thing that can carry 5 men and can dig underground, and infiltrate the enemy base. Eg. build like 5 filled with engineers and pop up in their base and take it over lolGrin



this is an older post but esh man play ts they have the subterrainial apc and they dont work, they just get blown upas soon as they surface
 
KOGdemIcon...06:52 04.09.05 

 Reps: 33

#428, 22 Posts


06:55 04.09.05 - Edited

i dont think they should have the bulldozers in it thats like age of empires style it should still be like the originals

ahh the super ppl... tanya should still be in it i wouldnt really change anything with her giving her more armor maybe but then she'd cost a shit brick more but yea there should also be kane as previously said and for ppl saying wierd things about him getting a chrono and that explaining his appearance in RA1 there already is an explination in TS.. his saying is he who controlls the past commands the furture and in TS, RA1 is the past which is why he says that

he should bring in nod to RA but that would be wierd maybe be like less high tech crap but keep the cyborgs those guys are pro is he is a hero guy u can use he should have is arm blown off in something so he has the cyborgs chain gun arm with like Flak gun for planes but stronger and make him slower but able to snipe putting his chain gun in semi auto state.. that wud be sweet
 
Apocalypse_TankIcon...03:47 20.06.06 

Chaplain of CNC


 Reps: 254

#359, 219 Posts


blank
New Allied Units:
in my opinion 1. ChronoCruiser(sea)
2. Ion Trooper (infantry)
New Allied Super Weapon: (this one is economical) Ore Generator (good with the ore purifier)
New Soviet Units: 1. Tesla Bomber (tank)
2. MiGs & A4-76 (air)
New Soviet Country: Japan
New Soviet Super Weapon: Hiroshima Bomb AirStrike
New Soviet Building: Soviet Airfield

And totally scrap the Yuri Faction
 
bigguy563Icon...04:18 20.06.06 

reputed member


Reps: 924

#34, 545 Posts


blank
I hate to burst your bubble, but we now know that RA3 has been scrapped. The game never made it past development stages. (if it made it there)
 
Apocalypse_TankIcon...07:49 21.06.06 

Chaplain of CNC


 Reps: 254

#359, 219 Posts


blank
i no that but what if it did male it into production, have u ever thought of that
 
CombatmanIconRa322:54 19.08.06 

Please replace avatar!
 Reps: 19

#1178, 9 Posts


blank
Red Alert 3 should have more units and a greater amount of units for atacks. Bij Red Alert 2 I win a war with 10 Prism tanks. I don`t like that, I want more! I want that I need a large (cheap) army to atack! Large losses by my army, even larger losses by my enemies army Grin Tongue
If there was a 3e world war, it was'nt won by only 10 thanks, but by a verry big army!
Just an idea: make the armys larger!
 
bigguy563Icon...01:18 20.08.06 

reputed member


Reps: 924

#34, 545 Posts


blank
Well to tell the truth, if you beat someone with ten prism tanks then they proably aren't very good. To some degree, the size of an army depends on the map resources. For instance, if you like large armies, play Heck Freezes Over. There's tons of ore and gems which generally results in huge forces.
 
DoctorspoofIcon...17:57 06.06.07 

Please replace avatar!
 Reps: 21

#1555, 10 Posts


17:58 06.06.07 - Edited

personally, i think that if Ra3 was ever made for any reason at all, it should be like a 3d version of ra2, but advancing through the storyline, obviously. The units were balanced and although the techs see unfair (allied with spysat and gap gens, soviets with nothing of that calibur), after playing a few matches online you can see that even though the soviets don't have much in the way of cool technologies, they have some pretty daaaaaamn awesome tanks (apocs, i love you so ^^) which make up for it. There wouldn't be much point in giving soviet's aircraft unless they were much weaker than allied aircraft, cos soviets have better AA than allieds, which would unbalance air combat and the entire tech tree, in my opinion. Also, the 'Hiroshima Bomb Strike' attack wouldn't make much sense, it was America that bombed hiroshima so it wouldn't make much sense to give it to the soviets, unless it's part of the storyline where Einstein buggered up WW2 as well..... Just a thought Grin
 
SpygonIcon...18:44 06.06.07 

Defence Specialist


 Reps: 478

#1127, 404 Posts


blank
in the ra storyline due to Einstein killing hitler the second world war never happened so the 'Hiroshima Bomb Strike' never happened as america never went to war with japan.So the russians start building loads of nukes and tanks to prepare for the attack on europe (ra1) hope that helped with the reason the russians have nukes and the allies even thou they dont have as many but do in (ra1)
 
DoctorspoofIcon...18:08 07.06.07 

Please replace avatar!
 Reps: 21

#1555, 10 Posts


blank
still wouldn't explain why it would be called 'Hiroshima' bomb strike thoughz. 'Sides, they already got nukey missiles, and the nuke bombs maerica used in WW2 are of a lower standard than modern nuclear missiles (obviously)
 
SpygonIcon...18:35 07.06.07 

Defence Specialist


 Reps: 478

#1127, 404 Posts


blank
isnt ra1 set in the 60s that might be aload of rubbish but i am sure i heard somewhere and wheres it called the 'Hiroshima' bomb strike Confused as that would make no sense at all.
 


Post A ReplyAdd New Thread
Page 2 of 3«--123--»
Navigation:

CNCSeries.Com